Today we are still engaging in the debate started in the late 18th century. We continue to struggle to define universally the “rights” guaranteed to all human beings. As seen in the Declaration of Independence (1776) and the French’s Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen (1789), the rights guaranteed to man are just that - rights given to specific men, not to everyone.
1 2 The reason for this is the fact that those who already have the rights do not want to allow others to enjoy the same freedoms as they do. Somewhere along the line, certain individuals perceived themselves better than others and sought to subjugate them. Some, claiming divine right, took advantage of a religious population to catapult themselves into superiority without actually having any superior qualities. Religion, in my deepest belief, should have no bearing on idea of equal rights for all. The concept of one person deserving more rights than another is nothing more than the “haves”’ unwillingness to hand over power stolen from a society thousands of years ago. Unless those in control unexpectedly agree to relinquish this power, we will continue to fight the same battles of the 18th, 19th, and 20th centuries. When will we as a society decide that fair is fair and equal is equal for ALL, not just some? Have we been brainwashed by those in power to perceive ourselves less than they? They are in power because they
took it, and we’ve sat back and accepted our fate as inferiors. We’ve stood by for centuries as our fellow humans have been ostracized for being anything but straight, rich, male, and Christian. The sickening hypocrisy of the latter is, for a religion so obsessed with persecuting homosexuality, their own priests have a problem keeping their hands off of little boys. Furthermore, instead of calling foul, the Church decides that they should simply cover it up because their priests are somehow above the laws which apply to everyone else. Who gave them these privileges? If you say God, then whose God? Is it God’s will for individuals to enslave entire races of people and kill thousands in the name of their definition of God? Did God intend to create a world where some people have all and many have none? No, but society, religion, government, and social norms did. So once again, until we as a society decide that right is right and equal is equal for all, we are destined to be a slave population to those who’ve
taken the “right” to tell us what we believe, who deserves, and who does not. A powerful and relevant quote on the topic comes from Olaudah Equiano in the previous module, where he states:
When you make men slaves you deprive them of half their virtue, you set them in your own conduct an example of fraud, rapine, and cruelty, and compel them to live with you in a state of war; and yet you complain that they are not honest or faithful! You stupify them with stripes, and think it necessary to keep them in a state of ignorance; and yet you assert that they are incapable of learning; that their minds are such a barren soil or moor, that culture would be lost on them; and that they come from a climate, where nature, though prodigal of her bounties in a degree unknown to yourselves, has left man alone scant and unfinished, and incapable of enjoying the treasures she has poured out for him!3
This is true even today. Those of us not in the top tier of society will always be slaves as long as we allow the top tier of society to make the rules. They will never relinquish the power they stole from the masses long ago unless
We the People decide that those “self-evident” truths our forefathers wrote about actually apply to all human kind and not just a select group within society. Until then, I’ll see you in shackles.
Full disclosure: I am a white male, raised in an upper-middle class household to be Christian and Republican. I have since been a Democratic political operative and have seen hypocrisy on both sides of the aisle; I no longer belong to any party. I also no longer call myself a Christian, as I cannot associate myself with any religion that says they stand for acceptance, all the while judging anyone not like them. I believe in the “Golden Rule” - treat others as you would like to be treated. If we all lived by this creed, society would be a better place for it. Unfortunately, some believe that they have the right to treat everyone like slaves and expect to be treated like gods in return. |
1.
Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen (August 26, 1789), in
The French Revolution and Human Rights: A Brief Documentary History, ed. Lynn Hunt (Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 1996), 77-79.
2.
Declaration of Independence (July 4, 1776), http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/declaration_transcript.html (accessed February 9, 2012).
3. Olaudah Equiano,
The Interesting Narrative of the Life of Olaudah Equiano, (1789), in
The Intersting Narrative of the Life of Olaudah Equiano: Written by Himself with Related Documents, ed. Robert J. Allison (Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2007), 113.
It's true that rights are given based on what the majority decides. That is why we vote for Presidents and laws. I like how you brought up Equiano and how he had no control over his rights, and was a slave because it appeased others to profit from slavery economically.
ReplyDeleteThere will always be people who try to philosophize and try to come up with better theories and dictate over people. It goes back to Marxism and the thought that ones race is more dominant than another...sad. There are also people who are corrupt that take on religious identities, such has priests, who only become priest for personal gain or simply for a career. And then there are men like Equiano, who actually believe and had faith and a personal relationship with God. Equiano truly identifies with his religion, Christianity, because Christ was real to him, not because he faked it.
Mr MaGrath,
ReplyDeleteI wholeheartedly agree with you passion. I love it! Rights as I argued are not rights, but rather they are privileges. They are bestowed upon us not by any divine intervention or natural birthright. Our peers present them to us as they see fit. Like you argue, more often than not, those who reside in the upper echelons of society enjoy more privilege. What's even worse than that is that it will never change. It isn't possible. I believe that it is human nature to be vile, deceiving and power hungry. If you don't by that argument just watch the news tonight. 28 minutes of evil and wrong doing and two minutes of some fabricated hope story-which is usually attached to an agenda. Enjoyed your rant bro.
Stephen Bishop
Three insurance companies insure most Protestant churches in America (Church Mutual, Guide One, and Brotherhood Mutual.) In the seven years between 2002 and 2005 they averaged 260 credible reports PER YEAR of people under 18 being sexually abused.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2007/06/18/80877.htm
Compare that with the average 218 credible accusations against Catholic clerics per year SINCE 1950 . Since the Catholic Church greatly outnumbers all other Protestant denominations combined in the United States and the data for Protestant churches is available only for the this seven year period as opposed to from 1950, we can safely say that pedophilia appears to be far more of a non-Catholic problem. This is most likely because ever since the first sexual abuse cases had been reported, Catholics have had the following requirements for all people interacting with children: 1) police background check done on all volunteers including priests, 2) a second person be present at all religious functions, and 3) all personnel involved with minors must take routine checks with "Protecting God's Children" on a yearly basis.
Up until recently, the rate for school teachers, residential home-counselors, social workers, or even scoutmasters, has never existed because they had no method of accounting for sexual abuse. However the 2007 AP investigation found more than 2,500 cases from 2001 to 2005 years in which educators were punished for actions from bizarre to sadistic. The same sort of outcry that came with Catholic sexual abuse has not existed with public school teachers.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/21/AR2007102100144.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1339581/Convicted-child-molesters-allowed-work-schools-background-checks-study-finds.html
Furthermore, I understand that sexual abuse in the military is a major problem. Last year nearly 50,000 male veterans screened positive for “military sexual trauma” at the Department of Veterans Affairs, up from just over 30,000 in 2003. I gather that you are military or ex military. Are you planning to write a companion, off topic, blog rant about your institution's problem with sexual abuse?
http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2011/04/03/the-military-s-secret-shame.html
Karen,
DeleteFirst and foremost, I apologize if I offended you in any way. I however believe that the assignment was to give our views on our current state of human rights as we saw it, and I did just that. Furthermore, I am not military or ex-military. I am actually a former high school teacher, and the son of a devout Christian, mental health counselor (who has worked her entire life attempting to heal those who've suffered from abuse, both sexual and mental). I agree that there are major issues across the board regarding rape and abuse, and I in no way meant to imply that the Church was the only guilty party.
Again, I apologize for offending you, and I hope that you can past my comment about the Church and see my argument for what it is - my views on where human rights are in this current day and age.
Brain,
ReplyDeleteI love your post! The passion! The outrage! It is very similar to the French outrage over the Declaration. I also am a white, middle-class American with a Baptist upbringing and private school education. Today, I am Atheist and liberal leaning in my political views. Like you, I believe that people should do the right thing, because it is the right thing, not because of religion, or fear of retribution in the after life. One point you made that stuck with me, was the quote from Equiano. I agree that is it outrageous to subordinate a group, and then judge them for not being equal when they have not had the access to the same education and opportunities to prove themselves. It is unreasonable to expect a group society (whether in the US or worldwide) has marginalized to break the cycle of a 'have-not' without equal rights to healthcare, education,and employment. There is a huge difference between a handout and equal opportunity and skills. This is a great article about America's 'caste system'. Even though it is older, I believe it is still appropriate.
John U. Ogbu. "Minority Education and Caste: The American System in Cross-Cultural Perspective."(Academic Press Inc: New York, 1978)